Horror Movies Forum - & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (TiM the Zombie) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:56:01 +0000

Slither was a fantastic film but people would rather see ice age 2 at the time which is pathetic.

Jon Stewart is a funny guy so I can see that to be very funny.

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (thegoldensimatar) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:05:28 +0000

Slither was an awesome film but sadly didn't do to well.

Oh, I finally got around to it and sorry for the delay. Tonight on Comedy Central at 8pm The Daily Show is Jon Stewart interview Sam Jackson about Snakes On A Plane. It is last night's show and i caught the tail end of it and it is pretty funny.

Thats 8pm EST on Comedy Central.

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (TiM the Zombie) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:20:09 +0000

I think we've all been wrong before... Slither...

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (Goon) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:50:37 +0000

Well I think thats why some people love it and others dislike it.. I mean to me it sounds like cheesy goodness to other people they just think "WTF?".. Although I think most people are just pissed off because everyone is really hyping the movie.

Personally I think it will do VERY well in the box office. But I have been wrong in the past..

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (TiM the Zombie) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:36:51 +0000

I know a lot of people who are judging the movie on the title. It's starting to piss me off, its getting so bad. I think this is going to be an extremely underestimated film. If you were trapped on a small airplane, in which you cant jump out of or you'd die a very painful death, full of poisonous snakes that if you were bitten you would die from the venom, what would you do? Not much. I think this movie is going to kick some serious ass and its going to be even more frightening considering i'm afraid of snakes specially' poisonous ones. Samuel L. Jackson is one badass motha fucka and has the role of the detective where he can kick the crap out of those reptilions! Ignore the title and go check it out!

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (Dobe Dobe) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:28:48 +0000

I've hated Snakes on a Plane since I first heard about it. Elsa Pataky is the only reason I might watch it.

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (Dean Valent) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:01:45 +0000

Don't judge a movie on it's title,
"Forest Gump" What, a forest full of gump? NO WAY!
"Groundhog Day" I hate groundhogs, it's gonna suck!

I'll probably wait for a week after it's out to see it. Like Goon said, it has Samuel Motherfuckin' L Jackson in.

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (Insomniac.Freak) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:42:36 +0000

I think the movie's goin to be stupid...I mean..come on! snakes on a plane? sheesh!

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (thegoldensimatar) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:41:55 +0000

I'm scared of snakes...so Snakes on a Plane is a definate for me. Snakes on a Train....I dunno, its an obvious cash in on SNAKES ON A PLANE yet unlike HILLSIDE CANNIBALS (shudders with horrible memories) this seems to have at least a different storyline to a degree.

I think I will rent it when I got a free rental offer just to see how good/bad it is. When I do I'll review it.

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (DemonToSome) — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:13:22 +0000

Not interested in it at all. Snakes are Not frightening so I think the movies will be real boring to me

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (Goon) — Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:00:24 +0000

Snakes on a Plane definetly has my interest and I will see it on opening day. ANY movie with Samuel L. Jackson is worth seeing once..

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (TiM the Zombie) — Sun, 06 Aug 2006 23:38:03 +0000

I dont know, i'm pretty interested in seeing what this movie is like. I dont necessarily hate flying but I hate snakes. This film could get me scared easily so I'll def have to check it out...

Re: & Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (sickf**k) — Sun, 06 Aug 2006 23:28:41 +0000

everyone i know said this movie is gonna be gay just look at the title snakes on a plane it sounds gay to me i would like to c it and that snakes on a train sounds gay i saw that in fangoria and i never liked those movies like hillside cannibles and the child 666 and when a killer calls they are so stupid

& Now we got Snakes On A Train!

dummy@example.com (Norrock The Zombie Eater) — Sun, 06 Aug 2006 18:17:23 +0000

Yeah so 3 days before Snakes on a Plane hits the big screen we are going to get the starght to DVD ripoff Snakes On A Train ( http://www.horror-movies.ca/horror-movie.php?id=5635 ) I myself can't wait to see how the Samuel L. Jackson flick Snakes on a Plane turns out, But after reading over both story lines as much as i hate to say this, The story line to Snakes On A Train sounds a bit more interesting, (Storyline Snakes on a Plane. an FBI agent is escorting a witness on a flight from Hawaii to Los Angeles when an assassin releases hundreds of deadly snakes on a commercial airplane in order to eliminate the witness. The FBI agent, along with a rookie pilot, frightened crew and passengers must then band together in a desperate attempt to survive) (Storyline Snakes On A Train. Under a powerful Mayan curse, snakes are hatched inside a young woman, slowly devouring her from within. Her only chance for survival is a powerful shaman who lives across the border. With only hours to live, she jumps on a train headed for Los Angeles. Unfortunately for the passengers aboard, they are now trapped, soon to be victims of these flesh-eating vipers) So just by looking over both back to back what one sounds more interesting?, I would say Snakes On A Train but we all know how the cgi can be on thos starght to DVD ripoffs. And 95% of the times they turn out to be shit.