I don't think they are always done for money cause it's been ten years since the last Scream 3, they made Scream 4 cause they really had a good story.

We must have seen different Scream 4's.  The one I saw sucked.

I hate the fact that sequels are always based on money. A flick could have every character killed, and the world blown up, and these days would "warrant a sequel" if it made enough money.

I still say there should be a Supreme Court ruling on a legal limit of 3. Trilogies only, nothing more, ever. If you make a fourth one, or try and veil it as a "spin off", you're shot and buried at sea.

I don't think they are always done for money cause it's been ten years since the last Scream 3, they made Scream 4 cause they really had a good story.
Regarding that you should only get trilogy's, i for one like Halloween 4 & Friday the 13th 4: The Final Chapter, even though it wasn't.

I still say there should be a Supreme Court ruling on a legal limit of 3. Trilogies only, nothing more, ever. If you make a fourth one, or try and veil it as a "spin off", you're shot and buried at sea.

Why do you guys always wanna beat Dead?  If I wrote that you'd have me banned.

It's easier than spanking the monkey. 

I don't see the point.  But you can always count on the Weinsteins to beat a dead horse even deader.

Does this mean DeadHorse has to change his name to DeaderHorse? 

I'm not surprised.  I'm kind of indifferent to a #5, actually.