Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger (Page 1) - Horror Literature

1 Topic by thegoldensimatar 2010-05-08 09:41:59

thegoldensimatar
Moderator
Offline

From: Warenton,Virginia/Savannah, GA
Registered: 2006-06-14
Posts: 4,135
ToeTags: 600

Topic: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

To be quite honest, I'm not much of a Beatles fan; I've just never gotten into their music.   Rolling Stones however, I'm a huge fan of.  So needless to say this story is going to be show everyone's true colors on this site; who is on ...

thegoldensimatar's Website

2 Reply by hellrat 2010-05-08 10:08:35

hellrat
Spamworth's Spamtacle
Offline

From: Bansville pop. hellrat
Registered: 2009-07-25
Posts: 10,456
ToeTags: 20061

Visit My MorgueSpace

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

I smell a lawsuit.

3 Reply by ZOMBIE SLASHER 2010-05-08 13:26:40

ZOMBIE SLASHER
Bringer of Death
Offline

From: Scotland
Registered: 2009-05-24
Posts: 1,456
ToeTags: 2445

Visit My MorgueSpace

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

I think that sounds like the biggest load of crap i have ever heard of, by the way i'm a Stones fan & think The Beatles are overrated.

4 Reply by deadhorse13 2010-05-08 13:37:52

deadhorse13
Lilliput General
Offline

From: Satantonio, Texass
Registered: 2008-07-22
Posts: 17,452
ToeTags: 30166

Visit My MorgueSpace

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

Love em both, but The Beatles take the gold. Sure the Stones had the nastier, more rebellious image, but The Stones were a standard 12 bar blues band for quite awhile before taking cues from The Beatles themselves and expanding their repertoire. Over the course of their catalogs it's hard to refute that The Beatles have the more versatile and experimental. To each his own.

They're both dead to me these days, so what's the difference, huh? LOL

Anyways, this entire premise does sound pretty weak.

deadhorse13's Website