Topic: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

To be quite honest, I'm not much of a Beatles fan; I've just never gotten into their music.   Rolling Stones however, I'm a huge fan of.  So needless to say this story is going to be show everyone's true colors on this site; who is on ...

Read More : Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

I smell a lawsuit.

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

I think that sounds like the biggest load of crap i have ever heard of, by the way i'm a Stones fan & think The Beatles are overrated.

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

Love em both, but The Beatles take the gold.  Sure the Stones had the nastier, more rebellious image, but The Stones were a standard 12 bar blues band for quite awhile before taking cues from The Beatles themselves and expanding their repertoire.  Over the course of their catalogs it's hard to refute that The Beatles have the more versatile and experimental. To each his own.

They're both dead to me these days, so what's the difference, huh? LOL

Anyways, this entire premise does sound pretty weak.

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

Don't care for either band and thats one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

lol I think it's a hilarious idea!! lol

By the way, I love both The Beatles and The Stones, but I'm going with The Beatles. big_smile

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

the stones all the way!, keith richards all ready looks like a zombie...

Re: Zombie Beatles vs Mick Jagger

The Beatles!!!! tongue