Pages 1
You must login or register to post a reply

- JJ
- Grrrrrrrrr
- Offline
Topic: Scream 5
Okay so i just saw a interview with Harvey Weinstein and he said that Scream 4 did well enough to deserve a sequel and he is sure its gonna be made! what do you guys think is this good or bad to have another Sequel??
Re: Scream 5
Well, Scream 4 was supposed to be a new trilogy, so it really wouldn't surprise me at all. I really enjoyed Scream 4, but it wasn't everything that I thought it would be. Pretty much the same old with new characters, but the main characters are still alive so I don't know how to feel about it. Plus the humor was ridiculous for a horror film, I mean it has to be the most humorous horror movie I've seen that was taken so seriously. Doesn't live up the original, about the same as Scream 2 but bettr then Scream 3. I'd pay to see Scream 5.

- Meh
- Bad Ass Mofo
- Offline
Re: Scream 5
JJ got a link to the interview? its news worthy.

- JJ
- Grrrrrrrrr
- Offline

- Meh
- Bad Ass Mofo
- Offline
Re: Scream 5
Not surprised at all, I enjoyed Scream 4 so I'm up for another one.
Re: Scream 5
I don't see the point. But you can always count on the Weinsteins to beat a dead horse even deader.

- azathoth
- Monkey Lord of Awesomeness
- Offline
Re: Scream 5
LoudLon wrote:I don't see the point. But you can always count on the Weinsteins to beat a dead horse even deader.
Does this mean DeadHorse has to change his name to DeaderHorse?  I'm not surprised. I'm kind of indifferent to a #5, actually.

- Ghostseeker
- More a Louis Tully than an Egon Spengler
- Online
Re: Scream 5
Why do you guys always wanna beat Dead? If I wrote that you'd have me banned.

- azathoth
- Monkey Lord of Awesomeness
- Offline
Re: Scream 5
Ghostseeker wrote:Why do you guys always wanna beat Dead? If I wrote that you'd have me banned.
It's easier than spanking the monkey. 
Re: Scream 5
it's true - chimpin ain't easy. heh
Re: Scream 5
I hate the fact that sequels are always based on money. A flick could have every character killed, and the world blown up, and these days would "warrant a sequel" if it made enough money. I still say there should be a Supreme Court ruling on a legal limit of 3. Trilogies only, nothing more, ever. If you make a fourth one, or try and veil it as a "spin off", you're shot and buried at sea.

- azathoth
- Monkey Lord of Awesomeness
- Offline
Re: Scream 5
^^^ Damn, you're hardcore.
Re: Scream 5
Zed_Chuva wrote:I hate the fact that sequels are always based on money. A flick could have every character killed, and the world blown up, and these days would "warrant a sequel" if it made enough money. I still say there should be a Supreme Court ruling on a legal limit of 3. Trilogies only, nothing more, ever. If you make a fourth one, or try and veil it as a "spin off", you're shot and buried at sea.
I don't think they are always done for money cause it's been ten years since the last Scream 3, they made Scream 4 cause they really had a good story. Regarding that you should only get trilogy's, i for one like Halloween 4 & Friday the 13th 4: The Final Chapter, even though it wasn't. 
Re: Scream 5
Yeah, another Scream movie

- JJ
- Grrrrrrrrr
- Offline
Re: Scream 5
looks like we might be waiting awhile for this movie, i dont know if its good or bad but Wes said that he for sure isnt doing anything until after the summer!!!
Re: Scream 5
ZOMBIE SLASHER wrote:I don't think they are always done for money cause it's been ten years since the last Scream 3, they made Scream 4 cause they really had a good story.
We must have seen different Scream 4's. The one I saw sucked. 
Re: Scream 5
Ehhh, I'm not sure how to feel about it. Granted Scream 4 was pretty good, although the acting was a bit..off. At least coming from the original cast. At least to me. But hey, I grew up on Scream and if it looked good enough, I'd pay to see another. 
Posts [ 19 ]
Pages 1
You must login or register to post a reply
|
|
|