Carrie (2013) Remake Review

Flay Otters 18 Comments Movie Page: Carrie (2013)
Carrie (2013) Remake ReviewI’m going to go on faith that a good many of you are well familiar with the original De Palma film from 1976 and the place it holds in horror history. Sissy Spacek is so perfect in that role that it is near-impossible to picture anyone else playing Carrie White. So it was with some reservation that one ventures into the theatre to see a new telling of this classic story with new WB-faced actors, modern technologies (smart phones, the internet etc) and a very different style director helming the film. I am absolutely not one of those people that decries every remake (unless you’re talking about the Night Of the Demons remake, in which case I’ll decry that all damned day) and I feel like the best course of action is to try to come in with as little expectation as possible. Not an easy feat, that. I know.

So what do you get from this film once you’ve made peace with your reservations, frustrations about remakes and tried to not obsess about your expectations? A pretty decent, sometimes great, sometimes frustrating retelling of Carrie White’s story crafted with care for the audience and care for the core meaning of the story.

Because when it all comes down to it, Carrie is really about abuse in multiple forms. Abuse and bullying from peers, abuse from a cruel and thoughtless mother and abuse from a tattered and useless security net of a school system. Carrie isn’t only about the central character and her telekinetic powers as much as it is about the ugly and sad result of layer upon layer of abuse heaped on her. There are no innocent bystanders in Stephen King’s story and director Kimberly Peirce seems to understand that concept in her version. The execution of that understanding, though, is sometimes choppy and frustrating and doesn’t pay off in a devastating way for the people it should devastate. It is as if they are led to that edge but wander alongside it versus toppling over. If you don’t sense that they feel that punch of guilt in the stomach, the sense of fault, then even dying doesn’t really resonate in some cases.

That said, there is a more intimate nature to Carrie’s innocence falling apart in this film that is handled in a measured way. She doesn’t go from zero to sixty in the snap of a finger and by the time we get to the fateful prom, we understand the depth of isolation she has tried to crawl out from. The human drama of that path is executed in small, seemingly insignificant scenes that really draw you into her as a human character and not only as a monster in waiting. A sincere compliment about her dress at the prom, the disarming way in which the dream-boat boy courts her, things like that. If all you’re trying to do is barrel towards the big payoff, these little human moments don’t matter so I was glad to see them as part of the story.

However, one of most frustrating things about the film is the way in which these well crafted scenes and humanity are interrupted by repetitive throw-ins as she discovers the depth of her powers. There are only so many times you can see her testing the limits and/or playing with her surroundings before it doesn’t elicit much of a response from the viewer. On the one hand, it was smart to show her trying to gain an understanding of what she can do and taking some degree of pleasure in it but it also didn’t have to be done over and over. Further, the parallel between Carrie owning her supernatural abilities and Carrie as a girl owning her transition to becoming a woman could have been more natural and less gimmicky and would’ve resonated a lot more. It doesn’t take a genius to draw that line between the two things and I really wished the film didn’t muddle those realizations and that humanity with one more ‘moving stuff with your mind’ scene done more for awe that substantive discourse.

This starts to really become an issue as we head toward the bloody final act. You want to be afraid of her and be afraid for her but that only comes when you feel like it is all happening naturally. The near-constant interjection of her using her powers in pretty meaningless ways is not unlike Samantha on Bewitched. It’s cute, not scary. It robs weight from what we know or what we sense (if you don’t know the original story) is going to happen. Cut those scenes in half (or more) and the boiling over at prom gets a bigger impact. Because while a lot of that fateful prom sequence is pretty grisly, you never get totally lost in it because you’re reminded pretty regularly that computers are doing a lot of the work. This is a damned shame because you can drag a lot more out of the audience by not showing this card in obvious ways. In this version of Carrie’s prom, however, that suspension of disbelief doesn’t ever kick into high gear and I blame the shimmery distraction of misplaced CGI for that fault.

I give a lot of credit to director Kimberly Peirce for getting solid performances out of Chloë Grace Moretz as Carrie, Julianne Moore as her crazed mother Margaret, Ansel Elgort as heart-throb Tommy and Judy Greer as gym teacher Ms. Desjardin. These four really carry their respective branches of the film and each get their own intimate moments to shine. One scene with Moore as Margaret, for example, in the dry cleaner where she works made me squirm like crazy and wouldn’t have meant much had it been rushed or handled any other way.

I guess what I’m getting down to is that the film isn’t going to make you forget the original but it isn’t going to make you angry for existing either. There are some solid bits of drama and horror at work in the film that exist only for the unique way in which the director views the story and handles her actors. But for all those good parts, there are a lot of issues with the connective tissue of the film that make it a stop and start affair when the viewers nerves and heart demand more fluidity. You don’t get lost in the 2013 version of Carrie as much as you wait for it to gain its footing back from scenes of wasted opportunity brought on by too much reliance of CGI and not enough trusting the audience to fill in the gaps if they aren’t shown everything all at once.

3 / 5 stars     

Trending in Horror

25 Best Monster Movies Of All Time 20 Best Horror Films of 2011 Most Disturbing Horror Movies


Our policy for commenting is simple. If you troll or post spam or act like a child we will send you to your room without dinner and take away your posting priviledges. Have fun, be polite!

      1. Marc Tom Stieber October 18, 2013 at 2:28 pm

        Brian De Palma’s movie will always be the very best…

      2. Bj Sizemore October 18, 2013 at 2:48 pm

        Excellent. Looking forward to this, glad it doesn’t disappoint.

        • Ronald Schettino
          Ronald Schettino October 18, 2013 at 5:05 pm

          Just another Hollywood rehash, both slavishly devoted to DePalma’s original, and lacking any of that film’s style. Watch the older movie or read the book instead.

        • Bj Sizemore
          Bj Sizemore October 18, 2013 at 5:06 pm

          I’ve done both before and own both. Just looking forward to it.

      3. Bob Mikkelsen October 18, 2013 at 3:27 pm

        The reviews are in, the movie is boring and sluggish. The acting of morentz and Moore are terrible.

      4. Dave October 18, 2013 at 3:28 pm

        Yeah sorry but I’m going to pass big time on this movie. Most of the reviews coming in now say the story isn’t worth seeing again. A rehash of the original film. You would think if they were going the remake route they could at least maybe change things up by following the book more closely. At least it would have got more interest.

      5. Bob Mikkelsen October 18, 2013 at 3:29 pm

        Moore gives the worst performance of her life, and morentz can’t even figure out how to play the part, shifting back and forth. Its dreadful.

      6. Loucifer Rusconi October 18, 2013 at 5:11 pm

        Good review. I will pass.

      7. Tiago October 18, 2013 at 5:16 pm

        Very good review, thanks a lot for it.
        I really have doubts about Moretz playing Carrie, because as you said, she is cute.
        Sissy was a werid looking girl, but somehow pretty, and that worked perfect. Not to mention her performance, we all agree that was awesome.
        I don’t think this going to be another Curse of Chucky, and really, really surprise me.

      8. Aaron Whitsell October 18, 2013 at 5:38 pm


      9. Sean O'Donnell October 18, 2013 at 6:23 pm

        Depalma’s Carrie has been on a lot lately. The film is so dated its painful. from the hiked up tube socks to the absolutely unlistenable soundtrack. Travolta and Allen make a solid comedy duo though. Pig blood should have been replaced with the brown stuff.

      10. Sean O'Donnell October 18, 2013 at 6:25 pm

        Oh i am going to see the remake, not because i feel the need to see a film with no need for improvement, but its a tradition this time of year. And their is nothing else playing. captain Phillips, Gravity…no thanks!

      11. Lauren Lacey October 18, 2013 at 11:40 pm

        I absolutely LOVE this movie. I do not care what anyone else has to say, I believe it’s great. I’ve seen the original and I’ve read the book, but this movie caught my attention. Great movie. 8.9/10

      12. Carrie Esau October 19, 2013 at 12:14 am

        Sissy, the one and only CARRIE

      13. rik October 19, 2013 at 2:33 pm

        that’s like saying psycho needs an update because it’s black and white!!! a classic is a classic for a reason, not when it was made. there wouldn’t be a remake if the original didn’t leave a permanent mark on cinema history. One day the movies you love will be considered old and need a remake, and you will understand they are not getting the point of the story, they can’t get into it because of ( Tube socks).

      14. Keith Weakley October 19, 2013 at 10:11 pm

        another stupid remake.

      15. david October 24, 2013 at 3:27 am

        Its not a remake, its a movie based on the book, not on the movie. It should be viewed on its own merits. Both films are very good and bring both something different to the screen. I liked it. Cheers.

      16. bblgmpink October 28, 2013 at 7:19 am

        i liked it. i love SK and his stories and lots of movies based on his stories. i am a creature of habit and often times dislike change. i was pleasantly surprised with this movie. there were several parts that were pretty shitty ….like the cg shit mostly…but I enjoyed it. i was concerned for how pretty Carrie was going to be…but I think that the actress who portrayed her did a decent job of being completely awkward and irritating . . . but it never kept me from rooting for her. i hated and loved her…and when she learned the true power of her gift and the prom went to hell…….I enjoyed it.