Survival of the Dead Review
Written by: BernardoVillela2
Before diving in and talking about the film itself there are two tales to tell about the actual viewing of this film which are rather relevant. First being that even though this film is set in Delaware for much of it there were no showings on its opening weekend in either Wilmington or Newark, why? Which leads to the second tale. The film is available on Video on Demand through Verizon FiOS. Me and two friends viewed it at $7.99 for three as opposed to a movie theatre where that price would've been in excess of $30 USD.
While some fans of Romero might be a little put off by this different approach to the zombie tale he takes I love it personally. The zombie subgenre has been vastly overexposed in recent years, in fact, it's likely that only vampires are more in vogue at the moment for better or worse. Yet amazingly Romero keeps finding new ground to tread and he does so in this film with incredible deftness and skill.
The main issue examined in this film is how to handle the overwhelming amounts of the undead that exist. This debate is examined through the guise of a family feud. The opposing sides of the quarrel is kill them on sight versus capturing and trying to rehabilitate them to eat other game. As is frequently the case Zombism is seen as a disease so its a logical question to ask why is this the only disease in which summary execution is the only remedy?
Also vastly improved in this installment is the dialogue and the script overall. In fact, here Romero seemed to have addressed one of my main problems with Diary of the Dead head on and left his social commentary only in the voice-over narration and as expected that worked brilliantly and added poignancy to the tale and allowed for a subtlety in this film which is rarely seen in his works.
Those who admire and/or frequently view horror films develop quite a high tolerance for incompetent thespians, however, overall this cast may be the strongest he's had seeing as there is no one who makes you want to run smack into a brick wall while screaming. The standouts aren't many but again just the fact that there are standouts is great and there are three: Richard Fitzpatrick as Seamus Muldoon, Kathleen Munroe and Devon Bostick, seen earlier this year as Roderick the bullying older brother in Diary of a Wimpy Kid.
Not that everything is absolutely sparkling about this film. The cinematography for example is not always on. It has in it the kind of video images which show you why 35 mm film stock is still king. The framing is never terrible and the lighting is never godawful but a lot of it is awfully video. Based on what your tolerance is it may have a great effect on your view of the film. Some of the CG is surprisingly good some tries to do things beyond the capabilities of the film and is comedic, at times intentionally.
In this film there is also an awesome dovetail into Diary of the Dead as one of the minor characters carries over and we see where their stories intertwine. It is a great and fascinating storytelling technique not employed often enough in film and the fact that Romero chose to do it and executed it so well is the mark of a true auteur.
Another thing this film has going in its favor is an open ending- to an extent. Open endings are very hit and miss. Some work brilliantly and some make you wish they had sewn it up. Considering the narrative that proceeded the climax a neat ending just wouldn't have worked at all. The reason the openness of the ending is qualified is because while it does give you a verdict on whose assumption about the undead was correct, Muldoon or O'Flynn, it puts a twist on it that you're left thinking about. All this is done visually reinforcing the more subtle nature of this work as opposed to his others.
Survival of the Dead is definitely Romero taking his series in a different direction and if he can keep it this interesting I am definitely all for him continuing the series as he has stated he intends to.